<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>deli &#8211; and so she thinks</title>
	<atom:link href="https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/tag/deli/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk</link>
	<description>CREATE:COMMUNICATE:CONNECT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 13:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Leverage Models</title>
		<link>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/leverage-models/</link>
					<comments>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/leverage-models/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leverage models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andsoshethinks.wordpress.com/?p=4400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Seizing on electro and drawing on the depths of consciousness,Leverage Models create deliciously vibrant music. A bubbling sonic palette doused in multiple dimensions, the band makes glorious glistening&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="imagecache imagecache-film_preset_display imagecache-default imagecache-film_preset_display_default" title="" src="http://nyc.thedelimagazine.com/sites/upload-files/imagecache/film_preset_display/520c3a8cd7d8c%5B1%5D.jpg" alt="" width="750" height="500" /></div>
<div class="body1">
Seizing on electro and drawing on the depths of consciousness,<a href="http://leveragemodels.tumblr.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Leverage Models</a> create deliciously vibrant music. A bubbling sonic palette doused in multiple dimensions, the band makes glorious glistening sounds, nuanced with commentary and clever perceptive notes, that pulse with passion, short pounds and reverberating rhythms adding a complexity that never digresses from what it is – pure pop. Churning and bristling with self-confessed dark emotions, there’s a restlessness to it all, a deliberate provocativeness that thrives. It’s the masterwork of producer and creator Shannon Fields, his inspired hand sketching and shifting through the sounds of the bandmates to build music to dance, shake, groove and live to.<br />
<strong>Do you think that musicians must have a certain style, or is just a case of creativity and response to what is around you?</strong><br />
For a long time I looked down on the idea of making music within the framework of genre. I thought if that’s where your head was at that you were probably thinking too much about fame, fashion and other extra-musical things, and paying too little attention to the sounds themselves. But I&#8217;ve very slowly changed my mind. You can’t really shake external references to the larger world, it&#8217;s impossible to make non-idiomatic music. It seems to me that the more abstraction that’s involved in song-based music, the less meaning andmagic the music holds for most people because the less it&#8217;s referring to the things around us.</p>
<p class="rteleft">[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLpHc4-JHIk]</p>
<p class="rteleft"><strong>Working with more than 12 people on your latest album must have been an experience! Was it hard, and was the process collaborative or did you have to ensure control?</strong><br />
If you feel you have to work hard to maintain “control” than you probably aren&#8217;t in the right situation, and also know myself enough to know when it’s the right time to seek out collaboration and when it’s the right time to shut myself away for 3 months in my upstate studio and not talk to or share music with anyone. At the moment, collaboration feels natural and easy, and I’m working with the right people who give me the right amount of criticism, encouragement, feel good about contributing, and whose contributions make me excited about music. Leverage Models is still my baby, and everyone knows that, but there’s a lot of mutual respect and love with the people I choose to work with, that’s criteria #1 for me.</p>
<p class="rteleft"><strong>You love your gear don’t you?</strong></p>
<p>I’m not really a studio geek. I work on intuition. I believe in the things now that I believed in as a teenage music fanatic. I never cared much for stuff that seemed like it was a put-on, or rehearsed, or like a fashion accessory. That’s what I feel a kinship for.<br />
<strong>Why did you move from New York City to Cooperstown? Does location have an impact upon sound?</strong><br />
I do think location can have an impact on sound…I think location has a particularly heavy impact on performances in the studio, especially when any real level of improvisation is involved. When I produce other bands from NYC I often try to convince them to leave the city to do it. For me I’m not sure moving has had any obvious or direct impact on the sound of Leverage Models aside from removing some outside influences I didn&#8217;t really find helpful. The move to the country (we live on a working horse farm) was a joint decision with my wife and it had mostly to do with the quality of our lives…and some decisions we had to make about the kind of people we did and did not want to be. But my bandmates are based in Brooklyn and Queens and I’m in the city every few weeks, so that creative umbilical cord is still important and intact.<br />
<strong>The Guardian describes your music as &#8216;worship of 1982&#8217; and a desire to recreate the sound. Is this conscious? Is any of the music making process conscious?</strong><br />
I think, like a lot of these things a publicist threw up a reference to 1982 in a press release or an email and a writer decided to run with it. It’s a good press ‘hook’ for the story. I’m hyper-aware of the musical past I’m playing around with but I’m also not personally interested in pastiche. I’m not sure what MJ’s “Thriller”, ABC’s “Lexicon of Love”, The Associates “Sulk”, and Segun Adewale’s “Ase” (all made in 1982) have in common that could be picked out of a lineup of records spanning the late 70’s through the mid 80’s. They&#8217;re very different. A lot of records were made in 1982&#8230; I love records and, yes, I’m a bit of a music and music production nerd, but not so much that I could isolate the production techniques and fashions of 1982 (as opposed to 1981 or 1983) and claim to be an heir to them. There are also a lot of late 80s and 90s digital synths and guitar sounds on the Leverage Models record too. And a lot of auto-tune and current R&amp;B rhythms and textures. What draws me to a lot of the records I love from the late 70’s and early 80’s, is the really blatant combination of studio slickness and post-punk amateurishness, especially in some of my favorite vocalists of that time. There is a kind of hysteria in some of these records, a reckless abandon that I connect with, a lot of really beautifully weird experimentation with early digital technologies sitting aside a very settled and perfected use of analog technology and that clash of traditions excites me. I want pop music to make the moment feel like it matters at the same time that I want to dance. I want to dance and shake around like my life depended on it…and to believe that. I don&#8217;t want to ever feel like I&#8217;m wiser than the things I&#8217;m dancing to, I don&#8217;t believe in guilty pleasure. I don’t believe that good art is timeless because we aren&#8217;t timeless – we’re on a very short timer, you and I.<br />
http://nyc.thedelimagazine.com/17698/interview-leverage-models
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/leverage-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dog Water</title>
		<link>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/dog-water/</link>
					<comments>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/dog-water/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dog water]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andsoshethinks.wordpress.com/?p=4407</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Despite starting with chimes of melodic summer wistfulness, once the deadbeat conversational lyrics of Dog Water&#8216;s debut single Forget Your Life hit us, it is clear we are&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite starting with chimes of melodic summer wistfulness, once the deadbeat conversational lyrics of <a href="https://www.facebook.com/dogwaternyc" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Dog Water</strong>&#8216;</a>s debut single <em>Forget Your Life</em> hit us, it is clear we are descended into the underbelly of&#8230; the city, the life, the mind, all three and beyond, and the multiple dimensions that inhabits them. Multi-genre mash, the style is one of a collage of sepia Polaroids, incongruous on paper, awesome for audio: dreamy melodies, frantic power chords, loud-quiet-loud moments&#8230; it all sounds like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C86_(album)" target="_blank" rel="noopener">C86</a> stretched to the new millennium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/dog-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Half Waif</title>
		<link>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/half-waif/</link>
					<comments>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/half-waif/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brooklyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[half waif]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andsoshethinks.wordpress.com/?p=4402</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Merging disparate influences comes natural to Half Waif&#8216;s Nandi Rose Plunkett, maybe because of her Indian, Irish, Swiss and American roots, as well as classical training, love of&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="not_use" href="http://nyc.thedelimagazine.com/18302/half-waif-unveils-new-single-plays-cameo-on-0711" target="_self" rel="noopener"><img decoding="async" class="NodePic" src="http://nyc.thedelimagazine.com/sites/upload-files/1530465_713694238651924_624739836_n.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<div class="content">
Merging disparate influences comes natural to <a href="https://www.facebook.com/HalfWaif" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Half Waif</a>&#8216;s Nandi Rose Plunkett, maybe because of her Indian, Irish, Swiss and American roots, as well as classical training, love of electronic instrumentation, and a natural inclination towards a pop hook. New track &#8216;Ceremonial&#8217; (streaming) might take a while to enter your system, but once it does, you&#8217;ll be transported by its grace and unexpected depth. From globules of bouncy pop to classic low string style synths, the song shifts through genres with surprising dexterity. There’s a slight off beat to the 4/4 rhythm underpinning the various sonic layers, suggesting a slight element of conflict between the inner and outer, a transience, like that of the waif. Even her voice constantly shifts &#8211; crisp enunciation falls on the beat, punctuated with chanting gasps, followed by a soaring bridge with stretched vocals. A downshift in tempo two minutes in does not seem out of place in a track only 4 minutes long, but instead augments its simple symphonic quality
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/half-waif/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>WOLVVES and their kit</title>
		<link>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/wolvves-and-their-kit/</link>
					<comments>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/wolvves-and-their-kit/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 11:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[create]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolvves]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andsoshethinks.wordpress.com/?p=4342</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It’s rare to find top notch musicians and producers giving their soul to a musical project that puts edge and experimentation before anything else. Such is Brooklyn band&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s rare to find top notch musicians and producers giving their soul to a musical project that puts edge and experimentation before anything else. Such is Brooklyn band <a href="http://wolvves.com/">WOLVVES</a>, formed by the Valleau triplets, who forge suspenseful (if not terrifying), noir, experimental electronic rock. We asked a few question to the knob fiddler in the band, producer/multi-instrumentalist <a href="https://www.facebook.com/joshuavalleau">Joshua Valleau</a>, who worked among others with the likes of  Kanye West, DMC (of Run-DMC), Snoop Dogg, and Imani Coppola.<br />
<strong>How much of your recording is done at home versus in the studio?</strong><br />
I run a recording studio in Brooklyn, so we do everything there. We even rehearse there.<br />
<strong>What are the pieces of equipment that you find particularly inspiring when recording?</strong><br />
I think the vacuum of a blank stretch of time and the absence of sound is the the most directly incendiary combo for converting the epic of overlapping lifetimes and constant memories of the future into 3-7 minute mp3s. So a quiet room and nothing else to do for a few hours is at least several times more inspiring than the next few items down the list, which for us include a Neve 5452 console modified for direct outs, some synths (Pro One, Juno, JX-3P, Nord Leads, Superbassstation, CZ-101), pianos (Rhodes, CP-70, Kawai 7′ grand), organs, tape decks, crappy 90′s digital outboard, FutureRetro Mobius, guitar amps, drums. I guess the more I try to narrow it down, it’s really only about that first item on the list. Could definitely just be a laptop in that same room.<br />
<a href="http://audio.thedelimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads//2014/11/sci_proone1.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-8390  " title="sci_proone[1]" src="http://audio.thedelimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads//2014/11/sci_proone1-e1415374539127.jpg" alt="Sequential Circuits Pro One" width="300" height="138" /></a><br />
<strong>What one piece of hardware/software would you most like to add to your recording setup (cost not an issue)? Why?</strong><br />
More computers! Lol no but I’m totally serious. These days I’m growing a garden of computers. For us, I’m learning that the only way to achieve the ecstatic fury of uninhibited electronic music creation is by having access to the highest number of clock cycles operating on the highest number of cores logistically possible at any given moment. Anything less is a recipe for tears. Heartfelt thanks for option to seamlessly farm out DSP to other machines goes out to Vienna Ensemble Pro. Oh also I really want a <a href="http://gieskes.nl/effects/?file=dep-2">DEP2b</a>.<br />
<a href="http://audio.thedelimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads//2014/11/DEP2b-angle-051.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-8392 " title="DEP2b-angle-05[1]" src="http://audio.thedelimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads//2014/11/DEP2b-angle-051-e1415375001407.jpg" alt="" width="325" height="269" /></a><br />
<strong>Do you expect your next record to be self-produced, or would you like to work with a producer? If it’s the latter, who would you most like to produce your band, and why?</strong><br />
What we would love most is for the United States Secret Service to produce our next record. It seems like a match – they could make our whereabouts unknown, secure the entrances, cook for us, block all telecommunications, tech the outboard gear. Probably even run me cleaner power than I have right now. We’ll give them 4 points of course.<br />
<strong>Do you use rack effects or guitar pedals to forge your own sound? If you do, please list the ones you use the most and let us know why you love</strong> <strong>them.</strong><br />
I mean, Lewis runs his DrumFire through a Foxx Tone Machine clone that I had a guy build me a while back. Other than that some of my favorite distortion pedals are one or more channels on the Neve, a very bossy ’76 V4B, MCI JH-110 1/2″, Decapitator etc. I tend to mentally organize the spice rack not so much by brand or physical location/interface, but strictly by taste. There’s an ever-present continuum of sonic portraiture running through my head, and every different box or plugin of which I’m aware is a point in that spectrum. So a lot of times there’s a software-&gt;hardware or hardware-&gt;software thing going on. An automated (SoundToys) EchoBoy ride on a return with an automated ride on a send (on the same return) that’s feeding back into itself out to an amp in the live room that’s coming back through stereo mics into an outboard lexicon and then a final live ride into distorted territory on the Neve on its way back into the box would be a typical sort of thing. Then maybe print that to tape. There are also dozens of scenarios that I just haven’t had time to build yet.<br />
<a href="http://audio.thedelimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads//2014/11/52_screenshot_large1.png"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-large wp-image-8393 " title="52_screenshot_large[1]" src="http://audio.thedelimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads//2014/11/52_screenshot_large1-612x249.png" alt="" width="612" height="249" /></a><br />
<strong>Do you have a particular recording style that you aim for? What techniques do you employ to recreate it?</strong><br />
We’re constantly working to streamline workflow, introduce new aleatoric elements into our creative process, and take dysfunctional items off the table. There is a constant push to get everything that’s known into automatic territory as quickly as possible to make room for the unknown. We’ve come to finally understand that technology is a constant string of broken promises. And that understanding is also a key to unlocking the true powers of the technology – when you move your expectations away from your ‘idea’ and towards the current and unknown present. Let the road drive you a little.<br />
<a href="http://audio.thedelimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads//2014/11/1967_Fender_Deluxe_Reverb_A19496_0071.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-8394" title="1967_Fender_Deluxe_Reverb_A19496_007[1]" src="http://audio.thedelimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads//2014/11/1967_Fender_Deluxe_Reverb_A19496_0071-e1415376161708.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="246" /></a><br />
The last few weeks we’ve been doing stuff like combining arpeggiators, running an arpeggiating/randomizing reaktor ensemble off a hardware sequencer and running a synth with an internal arp off the reaktor ensemble – stuff like that. I like to play piano, Elizabeth just got a cello. Lewis is mixing &amp; mastering his rock band’s album and perfecting his pie crust. I’m hoping to find some time to put some contact mics in the bookcase next to the Hammond and track drums through them. There’s a song in every single position of the volume knob of my (Fender)  ’67 Deluxe. When you don’t feel like you’re going to die, then you’re getting somewhere.<br />
<strong>Who determines the direction and style of your recordings?</strong><br />
Ancient forces from the future, and our honest college best shot at trying to figure out what the hell they want from us. Sort of just like composing for Prince-Archbishop Hieronymus Colloredo in the royal court of Salzburg, or getting a call from Sergei Diaghilev who’s looking for some new ballets. Or scoring an episode of Twin Peaks. Only the creative forces we have to answer to are in the air and in the ground. Seems like a pretty good gig.<br />
<strong>Is there a person outside the band that’s been important in perfecting your recorded or live sound?</strong><br />
We have the precious and inestimable support of our family and friends, but no.<br />
<strong>What other artists would you say have had the biggest influence in your approach to recording? Why?</strong><br />
I wouldn’t say there’s a lot of particular influence to the approach coming from one or 5 directions. I’ve definitely checked out the approaches of many legendary engineers, producers and artists. That’s always cool. Alongside that, I’d say the inspiration of our heroes is of much more significance. Then you build yourself machines to get you going in directions you’re excited about. The way someone else did it was the right way before things were the way they are right now.<br />
<strong>Would you say that your live show informs your recording process or that your recording process informs your live show?  Both? Neither?</strong><br />
All the music that’s floating around right now was done before we ever played a show, so only the latter for that material. But as a matter of fact our live show has indeed begun to inform our recording process for the material we’ve been working on since then – none of which is out at all yet. There’s some more live drums, control elements ported over from the stage rig etc, and we’ve been doing some live full-band recording as well. Pretty sweet<br />
<strong>Is there a piece of equipment that you find particularly useful on stage?</strong><br />
Particularly useful to us on stage is a small box which contains a pair of mac minis along with several wired and wireless audio and midi interfaces and converters. This forms the technological central nervous system of the band on stage. All the audio is routed through the computers and sub-mixed down to a stereo pair before it hits the house. That provides a world of manipulation and control options that I feel will possibly never be exhausted. Those limits now are primarily defined by aesthetic considerations, which I consider to be a dream come true.<br />
<strong>With bands doing more of everything themselves these days (recording, performing, self-promoting, etc.) and the evermore multimedia nature of the world, how much effort do you put into the visual component of your band – fashion, styling, photography, graphic/web design, etc.?  Do you do these things yourself or is there someone that the band works with?</strong><br />
Actually that seems to be one of the strongest points of this band:  An internally and clearly defined, understood &amp; agreed-upon aesthetic, and the in-house expertise to iterate at will. Our primary limitation in that regard seems to be time (that’s why more computers). But like also we’re doing a music video soon &amp; enlisting a bunch of ppl, of course. How many outside hands we need depends on the job – kind of like the computers. But yeah mostly everything gets done by the 3 of us.<br />
<strong>What do you find to be the most challenging aspects of the recording process? On the flipside, what aspects are the most rewarding?</strong><br />
The process? Well it’s really simple. As long as the process is intact (things aren’t broken), then the process is the reward.<br />
[vimeo 104318139 w=612 h=344]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/wolvves-and-their-kit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>WOLVVES</title>
		<link>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/wolvves/</link>
					<comments>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/wolvves/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 09:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolvves]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andsoshethinks.wordpress.com/?p=4397</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It’s hard to get close to electronic trio WOLVVES, shrouded in mystery as they like to be. I gives= it a go, but like their sound, the answers could&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">It’s hard to get close to electronic trio WOLVVES, shrouded in mystery as they like to be. I gives= it a go, but like their sound, the answers could be drenched in layers of clandestine and furtive yet frenzied secrecy. Quivering synths, harmonized and fused vocals, the triplets take their classical training in piano, guitar, harpsichord, drums, and voice, chuck it in to their personal obsessions with synthesizers, drum machines, analogue tape and a host of buttons and beats, breaking down barriers in genre to create what they call ‘witch step.’ It’s an effort to listen to &#8211; this isn’t sunny afternoon music &#8211; but keep at it and on every go a new sound or state unfurls itself at, lucid and angry in shadowy ecstatic agitation. Bristling along before a detonation, it always feels a little terrifying, but utterly beguiling. This is the first time that New York triplets Joshua, Elizabeth and Lewis Valleau have united in music making, and it is taking them to peculiar and petrifying heights.</p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;"><strong style="font-weight:inherit;font-style:inherit;">The titles of your songs all suggest dark emotions and life turmoil, do you write from experience or interest in this side of life</strong>?</p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">Dark emotions perhaps, but not necessarily life turmoil. If the tone is dark, it’s exultant! We are reveling in the night.  We see our songs as being quite pious in a way – offerings to the gods like Kali or Tezcalipoca or Paula Abdul. We feel it’s important to cover all our bases just in case. “A Breath Away” for instance is a kind of ecstatic love and longing song about the Moon. We think she was appreciative, based on her recent astral acrobatics. An important part of our songwriting is storytelling as well. Our forthcoming album will complete the saga of teenage triplets who run away from a cottage in the woods towards the bright lights of the city. Sadly they are attacked and eaten by wolves on their journey, but in the process they become half-ghost/half-predator creatures that both remember being alive and enjoy their new lives as pure-minded killers.  The story is semi-autobiographical. 😉 “It Speaks” is really the seed of the album – the moment of transformation.</p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;"><strong style="font-weight:inherit;font-style:inherit;">Sibling rivalry or support?</strong></p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">Support, to the point of Hive Mind. TwinSpeak. Sympathetic Magick. Pushups. We make kick-ass band meals together. We do high-speed borough laps in the middle of the night banging Berghain techno mixes. We are love.</p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;"><strong style="font-weight:inherit;font-style:inherit;">What is the ghostliest experience to have happened to you? Do you believe we are &#8216;living in someone else&#8217;s past?&#8217;</strong></p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">The quote about “someone else’s past” is actually something William Gibson said at a talk we attended (his writing are a huge inspiration to us). We have had many experiences of slipped time, and a sense that the future, fully formed, is looking back on us. Neil DeGrasse Tyson could say it better – but the universe is powerfully haunted by itself.  We hope this means that Beyoncé will somehow live forever.</p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;"><strong style="font-weight:inherit;font-style:inherit;">New York is a city of bright lights &#8211; why so dark?</strong></p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">In the dark, the light shines brightest. New York City is our ultimate muse – our home; holy ground.  It lures to devour, and surrendering yourself is the first step of ascension. It baptizes you with poverty, aggression, bad smells and the elements, and you emerge reborn as its fierce offspring. It’s joyous, but very wild. Also Lombardi’s.</p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;"><strong style="font-weight:inherit;font-style:inherit;">Your music isn&#8217;t the most accessible &#8211; is it a process of creating for fame and success, or an elemental urge?</strong></p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">We respect and honor musical tools like pop and hooks  &#8211; they are powerful energy conductors, and some of our songs will demand them. But the songs are people too. Others will need to be a little more liminal, abstract &#8211;  maybe a little oblique. We are passionate about stretching out the moment between things – the emotions and colors we don’t have words for. We think these are the truest parts. Fame is never a factor, but we believe in power of a riot.</p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;"><strong style="font-weight:inherit;font-style:inherit;">Are you inspired by visuals and other art forms? It sounds like it&#8230; I can imagine glacial landscapes and deep philosophical conversations.</strong></p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">The phrase “Let’s make it sound the way ____ smells…” is not an uncommon statement when we are working. Haha…  All three of us have varying degrees of synaesthesia and therefore mixed metaphors are essential. We’d like put the whole world in our mouths, but for the sake of time let’s just talk about movies. 🙂  In the studio at all times Blade Runner is playing it 1/35th speed. Peter Greenaway, David Lynch, Kenneth Anger, Cronenberg, Buñuel, Jodorwosky, Guy Maddin, Blah blah blah Amen. However our favorite movie might be The Return of the Pink Panther. Or Purple Rain.</p>
<p style="font-style:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">http://nyc.thedelimagazine.com/17653/wolvves-interview-enigmatic-brooklyn-band</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/wolvves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A chat with&#8230;Leverage Models</title>
		<link>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/a-chat-with-leverage-models/</link>
					<comments>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/a-chat-with-leverage-models/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2014 16:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eighties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emerging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leverage models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[producer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shannon fields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synth]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andsoshethinks.wordpress.com/?p=3637</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Leverage Models make music to be to, dance to, feel to, whatever. With an undeniably eighties aesthetic going on, the sound is more complex in creation and product&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://leveragemodels.bandcamp.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Leverage Models</strong></a> make music to be to, dance to, feel to, whatever. With an undeniably eighties aesthetic going on, the sound is more complex in creation and product than being that of a simple era raid. There&#8217;s a pop dance aesthetic drawing from the depths of enchantment. I chatted to Shannon Fields, the producer behind the evolving collaborative outfit. The edited interview is in Deli Magazine&#8217;s Spring Emerging Artists issue 2014.<br />
<a href="https://twitter.com/LeverageModels"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-large wp-image-3638 aligncenter" src="http://andsoshethinks.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/leverage-models-10.jpg?w=440" alt="leverage-models-10" width="440" height="293" srcset="https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/leverage-models-10.jpg 480w, https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/leverage-models-10-300x200.jpg 300w, https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/leverage-models-10-370x247.jpg 370w, https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/leverage-models-10-410x273.jpg 410w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 440px" /></a><br />
<strong>Your musical style has morphed from folk to dance/synth &#8211; do you think that musicians must have a certain style, or is just a case of creativity and response to what is around you?</strong><br />
For a long time I looked down on the idea of making music within the framework of genre. I thought if that’s where your head was at that you were probably thinking too much about fame, fashion and other extra-musical things, and paying too little attention to the sounds themselves. But I&#8217;ve very slowly changed my mind over the past few years. I don’t know if sound can function very well, or gives us all that much outside of the passing conventions we make for it. You can’t really shake external references to the larger world, it&#8217;s impossible to make non-idiomatic music. It seems to me that the more abstraction that’s involved in song-based music, the less meaning and magic the music holds for most people because the less it&#8217;s referring to the things around us. Our ears aren&#8217;t reducible to the tympanic machinery -the sound has got to travel through all of the memories and associations that shape us emotionally and shape our world views before that sounds is really ‘heard’ in our brains. This is probably going to be taken wrong by some people whose work I hold dear and I don’t want to overstate it &#8212; I don’t want people to stop pushing the boundaries of traditional listening and a lot of very abstract music has been important to me, even changed my life (I would be a different person without the music of Francisco Lopez, Stephen Vitiello, Kevin Drumm, and Bernhard Guenter being in my life when I first moved to NYC). But for me, at the moment, I think being even just a little bit creatively disruptive within the very narrow confines of an established genre, one with a lot of participants at the table, is more meaningful and rewarding. It might have more of an impact on the conversation we’re all having than the music that pretends that it exists outside of all conventions and is in a sense more &#8220;free&#8221;, but which also belongs to only a few people. And this may account for why a lot of very free music can also be, ironically, incredibly boring (I&#8217;m getting myself in trouble again here, but I think it&#8217;s fair to say). These days I think I’m feeling less dismissive of the idea of emotionally connecting with people on an immediate level, in the moment, in a way that you can only do by presenting as much that is familiar and rewarding to people as you do the stuff that&#8217;s unfamiliar and frustrating. That push and pull is not an easy thing to do….but alienating people completely is a very easy thing to do.<br />
As far as what conventions my music has gravitated too, that’s all been a matter of intuition and heart, so I’m not sure why I’m embracing the sounds I’m embracing these days. They just feel good. And my focus may change tomorrow. For me Leverage Models is more about putting my arms around the immediate present in an almost naïve way and trusting my gut, and less about the sounds I happen to be using. There’s no style guide I’m working off of.<br />
<strong>Working with more than 12 people on your latest album must have been an experience! Was it hard, and was the process collaborative or did you have to ensure control?</strong><br />
If you feel you have to work hard to maintain “control” than you probably aren&#8217;t in the right situation (or you’re not the right person) to be collaborating in the first place. I&#8217;ve often found myself in that place in the past. At the moment, collaboration feels natural and easy. I’m definitely working with the right people who give me the right amount of criticism, encouragement, and whose contributions make me excited about music. I think having clear boundaries and being honest about those boundaries really helps. There is a lot of ego-driven baggage that can muddy the waters in a democratic band situation. And while I collaborate a lot, Leverage Models is still my baby, and everyone knows that. So people contribute what they feel good about contributing and I try to stay flexible and creative about how I keep certain collaborators engaged as much as they want to be, and how I can give back to them in their own work outside of Leverage Models. There’s a lot of mutual respect and love with the people I choose to work with, that’s criteria #1 for me. I also know myself enough to know when it’s the right time to seek out collaboration and when it’s the right time to shut myself away for 3 months in my upstate studio and not talk to or share music with anyone….just to take time to process what I’m receiving and where I think the real work is located in all of that noise. Collaboration doesn&#8217;t always make work stronger…often it can be the opposite. But it’s important sometimes to step outside of yourself and let other people frustrate or question your directions. And I even think that the volatility that sometimes comes from collaboration improves the work as well…in controlled doses, anyway…like a vaccine against an ego-driven creative rut.<br />
<strong>Why did you move from New York City to Cooperstown? Does location have an impact upon sound?</strong><br />
I do think location can have an impact on sound…I think location has a particularly heavy impact on performances in the studio, especially when any real level of improvisation is involved. When I produce other bands from NYC I often try to convince them to leave the city to do it. For me I’m not sure moving has had any obvious or direct impact on the sound of Leverage Models aside from removing some outside influences I didn&#8217;t really find helpful. The move to the country (we live on a working horse farm) was a joint decision with my wife and it had mostly to do with the quality of our lives…and some decisions we had to make about the kind of people we did and did not want to be. But my bandmates are based in Brooklyn and Queens and I’m in the city every few weeks, so that creative umbilical cord is still important and intact.<br />
<strong>You have played film festivals, MOMA, curated shows etc &#8211; what is the relationship between different art forms for you?</strong><br />
Oh, I don’t think I’m clever or articulate enough to answer a question so broad, not that it’s not a good question. Maybe the first step to talking about that would be to look at the fact that we use this common word – “art” – to describe a lot of activities that are strikingly different. And maybe the common thread there is that what “art” generally has in common across different media is that it’s all mostly useless!<br />
I’m being flippant when I say “useless” but there’s truth in the joke. The idea of “Use” in music is something I’ve been thinking a lot about. It plays into the question about genre a little bit too because since the later 19th century “Art” (with a big capital A) is this thing that started to separate from “craft”, as something that increasingly had an agenda of its own and was meant to challenge more than to give. It seems that since then, Art is something that is usually valued in part based on newness, innovation, and confrontation, a series of breaks from whatever recent past is judged to be spent, wrongheaded or backwards. Regardless of the medium or movement or scene it falls under, it seems like art that wants to be taken seriously as art is always a little obsessed with the notion that it must have this serious break with the recent past, and with convention, in order to gain respect. And it probably does.<br />
It’s interesting though to think that about music the other way. Before popular music started to be taken more seriously as “art” in the 60’s, music worked a little more like craft – valued based more on how well made something was, in a sense it was shared and elevated if it was useful to the community. Good music was just music that a lot of people connected with, and you didn’t have the same cults of personality popping up around an artisan. I’ve described Leverage Models as ‘folk music’ online…it’s a little bit of a joke but I also mean it. Most pop/rock music has more in common with the logic of folk music then high art. Take three steps back and there really are no original songs at this point, just the re-shaping of the same material. That&#8217;s going to get me in trouble too &#8212; if you want to start a fight with any band tell them they’re not ‘original’. But see, I think that’s totally okay. The idea of folk music is that it’s not defined by the sound of a banjo or acoustic guitar, but as music that’s based on a more closely held set of shared techniques and values and musical structures. It’s something that’s communal, passed on, reused. And so those folk forms are not as caught up in inter-generational warfare. I’m more interested in thinking about what I do now as a kind of craft and less as art. With the plurality of values and the ease with which we can share techniques in a post-Internet geography, craft is more interesting to me than ever, no longer as provincial and culturally insular. I used to, but no longer feel so close to that smug and superior modernist urge to blow the artifice of culture apart and get at some ineffable truth that must be sleeping underneath it all. And as a result I also don’t feel as much need to rub my different-ness and eccentricity in everyone’s faces while daring them to blink, though I’m also not trying to pander. People are afraid to talk about the quality of music anymore because the values of “high art” are so fuzzy and qualitative. But I think it’s perfectly fine to have strong opinions about how well-crafted our pop or rock music (including lyrics) is and I don’t think there is enough of that conversation being had by critics. A lot of work that&#8217;s elevated in online culture is exciting based entirely on the newness and innovation of it&#8217;s production. But a lot of that is also just really mediocre from a total craft perspective.  I do care about how well things are made but I also still care about what those things do, and what they say, and how they matter to people. I’m feeling like there is more political usefulness, as well as just creative satisfaction (working a long time simply to learn how to make a song or record really well), in thinking about my music this way. So I don’t know, maybe moving to the country did soften me. But I’m no less angry or restless then I&#8217;ve ever been.<br />
<a href="http://leveragemodels.tumblr.com/live"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-3639 aligncenter" src="http://andsoshethinks.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/leveragemodels.jpg" alt="leveragemodels" width="297" height="170" /></a><br />
<strong>The Guardian describes your music as &#8216;worship of 1982&#8217; and a desire to recreate the sound. Is this conscious? Is any of the music making process conscious?</strong><br />
Hahahaha. They sure did.<br />
Look, I think…like a lot of these things…a publicist threw up a reference to 1982 in a press release or an email and a writer decided to run with it. It’s a good press ‘hook’ for the story. But it also rhetorically disguises the gross reduction taking place (i.e., “look, 80’s music re-done!”) by using this very specific but also arbitrary number. So no disrespect to The Guardian….they seemed to like the music alright and I was very grateful for the exposure. But I want to be honest with you about where I’m coming from. I’m hyper-aware of the musical past I’m playing around with but I’m also not personally interested in pastiche. I’m not sure what MJ’s <em>Thriller</em>, ABC’s <em>Lexicon of Love</em>, The Associates <em>Sulk</em>, and Segun Adewale’s <em>Ase</em> (all made in 1982) have in common that could be picked out of a lineup of records spanning the late 70’s through the mid 80’s. They&#8217;re very different. A lot of records were made in 1982. I love records and, yes, I’m a bit of a music and music production nerd. But I’m not so much of a nerd that I could isolate the production techniques and fashions of 1982 (as opposed to 1981 or 1983) and claim to be an heir to them. There are also a lot of late 80s and 90s digital synths and guitar sounds on the Leverage Models record too. And a lot of auto-tune and current R&amp;B rhythms and textures. Late 80’s Miami freestyle and 90’s New Jack rhythms made a dent in my subconscious for sure.<br />
What draws me to a lot of the records I love from the late 70’s and early 80’s, is the really blatant combination of studio slickness and post-punk amateurishness, especially in some of my favorite vocalists of that time. There is a kind of hysteria in some of these records, a reckless abandon that I connect with. There is also a lot of really beautifully weird experimentation with early digital technologies sitting aside a very settled and perfected use of analog technology. That clash of traditions excites me. But I’m also inspired by things I have a strong negative reaction to…because I’m interested in all the baggage we bring to what is really just neutral sound before it bounces around against our inner experiences. I’d never really had much tolerance for slap bass or soprano saxophone before working on Leverage Models. I don’t know why those cheesy sounds started creeping into the music but my own knee-jerk dismissal turned into fascination and then love as I tried to find ways to make unloved or unfashionable sounds work in the music, to find ways to take those sounds out of the dungeon of my subconscious. Playing with fire like that was just a good way to force myself out of my comfort zone and arrive somewhere new. If I only focused on sounds that were currently in fashion then I’d sound like all of my sophisticated musical neighbors, some of whom sound like they’re trying desperately to get noticed by wearing the right sonic clothing this month, savvy as they all are. It’s a very easy trap to get caught up in. But I gave up on fitting in with any established scene a long time ago.<br />
The bottom line is I’m not really a studio geek. I work on intuition. I never cared much for stuff that seemed emotionally manipulative, or rehearsed, or worn like a fashion accessory. I have a bit of an anti-American Idol aesthetic, and have a knee-jerk reaction to music that seems to parade its instrumental or compositional chops around. I still want to be caught up in the moment. That blasé, too-cool-for-school persona infuriates me. I want pop music to make the moment feel like it matters at the same time that I want to dance. I want to dance and shake around like my life depended on it…and to believe that. I don&#8217;t want to ever feel like I&#8217;m wiser than the things I&#8217;m dancing to, I don&#8217;t believe in guilty pleasure. Ironic appropriation of musical kitsch from the 70’s through the early 2000’s seems pretty fashionable right now – and I know Leverage Models stands dangerously close to that line sometimes – but I feel no kinship with that at all. It’s completely emotionally alien to me. I don’t really allow a place in my music for kitsch, blunt irony and pastiche. I’m just slicing myself open and draining it onto a record. Since I’m neither special nor unique, other people are bound to feel it if I do it well. And it’s okay if it’s disposable, as long as it matters to someone for a bit. I don’t believe that good art is timeless because we aren&#8217;t timeless – we’re on a very short timer, you and I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/a-chat-with-leverage-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walking Shapes</title>
		<link>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/walking-shapes/</link>
					<comments>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/walking-shapes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24 hours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nyc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walking shapes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andsoshethinks.wordpress.com/?p=3546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#160; So here I am in the UK, obsessed with the idea of moving to New York, and stuck without a visa unless I become a running, funny&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="ContentBlock blogContent">
<div class="node post">
<div class="content">
<div class="field field-type-filefield field-field-upload">
<div class="field-items">
<div class="field-item odd">So here I am in the UK, obsessed with the idea of moving to New York, and stuck without a visa unless I become a running, funny nun, and New York keeps pounding out bands like <a href="https://www.facebook.com/walkingshapes"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc;">Walking Shapes</span></span></a>. Not only are the Brooklyn five piece really bloody good, they gig as frequently as the tube is delayed (often), with a run of <a href="http://www.girlieaction.com/dispatch/06490e8656d0bc67bcd368f4c507e898"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc;">24 gigs in different NYC locations in 24 hours</span></span></a> coming up – on April 24th no less! Stop teasing me!</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>New album <em><a href="https://soundcloud.com/girlie-action/sets/walking-shapes-taka-come-on/s-XUcXF"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc;">Taka Come On</span></span></a> </em>features thirteen songs of varying styles and sounds, exploring different routes to kick off a whole chain of neural responses that end in fizzing contentedness, via undulating emotional trajectory. Fuzzed geometric guitars wend under a melodic contour of clean keys, and there are jangly pop moments in counterbalance to darker EDM sounds. Opener and latest single<em> Woah Tige</em>r sees complex twiddling keys from Jake Generalli and a spoken singing style from Nathaniel Hoto, a pick’n’mix of sonic refractions and experiments that never veers into chaos, evoking comparisons with Late of the Pier. <em>Winter Fell</em> (see the video streaming below) hints at the busy yet lonely dynamic of the city, with what sounds like morphed emergency service sirens, while <em>Mussolini</em> suggests from its delicate chords and rolling rhymes that it should be a love song – but of course things are never so straight forward. The addition of a violin via Jessie Kotansky is genius, and the instrument is given a prominent position where least expecting, adding a haunting delineation and softening the sometimes caustic blows.<a href="http://andsoshethinks.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/walkingshapes.jpg"><img decoding="async" id="i-3548" class="size-full wp-image aligncenter" src="http://andsoshethinks.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/walkingshapes.jpg?w=502" alt="Image" /></a><br />
&nbsp;<br />
http://nyc.thedelimagazine.com/17588/walking-shapes-releases-lp-%E2%80%9Ctaka-come-on%E2%80%9D-plays-24-nyc-shows-24-hours
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://andsoshethinks.co.uk/walking-shapes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
